https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333207 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that charges for erection and commissioning should not be included in the assessable value for central excise duty calculation. The judgment emphasized the distinction between sale value and post-clearance activities, citing a Supreme Court decision to support its findings. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 12:29:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333207 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that charges for erection and commissioning should not be included in the assessable value for central excise duty calculation. The judgment emphasized the distinction between sale value and post-clearance activities, citing a Supreme Court decision to support its findings. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333207