<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 221 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 40,61,517 as deemed income under Section 2(22)(e), recognizing Rs. 4,08,800 as a business loss, and deleting the penalty of Rs. 14,75,850 under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of business advances and the nature of the transactions, supported by relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 221 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 40,61,517 as deemed income under Section 2(22)(e), recognizing Rs. 4,08,800 as a business loss, and deleting the penalty of Rs. 14,75,850 under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of business advances and the nature of the transactions, supported by relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>