<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the payment made to MMRDA for acquiring leasehold rights and additional FSI was not liable for TDS as rent under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue department and the cross objection filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 12:28:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the payment made to MMRDA for acquiring leasehold rights and additional FSI was not liable for TDS as rent under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue department and the cross objection filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>