https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333187 Revenue recovery sale proceedings were upheld because the interim protection tied to the amnesty request operated only after a proper application was filed within time, and the sale had already been conducted before that application. The later allowance of the amnesty request, coupled with non-compliance with the time granted for remittance, did not invalidate the sale or its confirmation. The court also found no statutory basis for adjusting the value of Government-purchased bought-in land against the arrears due, and the cited precedent did not create a general right of set-off. The challenge therefore failed and the writ petition was dismissed. en-us Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 12:27:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333187 Revenue recovery sale proceedings were upheld because the interim protection tied to the amnesty request operated only after a proper application was filed within time, and the sale had already been conducted before that application. The later allowance of the amnesty request, coupled with non-compliance with the time granted for remittance, did not invalidate the sale or its confirmation. The court also found no statutory basis for adjusting the value of Government-purchased bought-in land against the arrears due, and the cited precedent did not create a general right of set-off. The challenge therefore failed and the writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333187