<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 205 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333185</link>
    <description>The court upheld the applicability of TDS on payments to the petitioner for exhibiting cinematographic films, rejecting the challenge to the vires of Rule 28AA. It emphasized engaging with the assessing officer for concessions under the law, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s claim that no TDS should be deducted. The validity of the certificate under Section 197(1) was analyzed, with directions given for seeking relief through statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 205 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333185</link>
      <description>The court upheld the applicability of TDS on payments to the petitioner for exhibiting cinematographic films, rejecting the challenge to the vires of Rule 28AA. It emphasized engaging with the assessing officer for concessions under the law, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s claim that no TDS should be deducted. The validity of the certificate under Section 197(1) was analyzed, with directions given for seeking relief through statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>