<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (5) TMI 67 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186986</link>
    <description>Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act was construed broadly so that a change in the weekly rest day from Sunday to another day fell within the Fourth Schedule and required prior notice; without such notice, the change was ineffective and the existing rest arrangement continued. Paragraph 8 of the Coal Mines Bonus Scheme was upheld because the scheme-making power authorised ancillary provisions needed to implement the bonus scheme, including machinery for determining whether a strike was legal or illegal. As coal mines are a public utility service and no section 22 notice had been given, the deliberate closure of the collieries on the relevant dates amounted to an illegal lock-out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 11:04:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (5) TMI 67 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186986</link>
      <description>Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act was construed broadly so that a change in the weekly rest day from Sunday to another day fell within the Fourth Schedule and required prior notice; without such notice, the change was ineffective and the existing rest arrangement continued. Paragraph 8 of the Coal Mines Bonus Scheme was upheld because the scheme-making power authorised ancillary provisions needed to implement the bonus scheme, including machinery for determining whether a strike was legal or illegal. As coal mines are a public utility service and no section 22 notice had been given, the deliberate closure of the collieries on the relevant dates amounted to an illegal lock-out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>