<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 63 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186982</link>
    <description>A statutory provision treating municipal notification as conclusive proof of lawful tax imposition was upheld because it operated only to finalise compliance with the prescribed procedural safeguards and did not extend the levy beyond the Legislature&#039;s taxing power. The Court held that sections 131 to 135 created a complete scheme of consultation, objection, approval and notification, so section 135(3) did not amount to excessive delegation, unconstitutional discrimination, or an impermissible conferral of judicial power on the executive. On that construction, the municipal tax was validly imposed and the challenge to the levy failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 10:44:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 63 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186982</link>
      <description>A statutory provision treating municipal notification as conclusive proof of lawful tax imposition was upheld because it operated only to finalise compliance with the prescribed procedural safeguards and did not extend the levy beyond the Legislature&#039;s taxing power. The Court held that sections 131 to 135 created a complete scheme of consultation, objection, approval and notification, so section 135(3) did not amount to excessive delegation, unconstitutional discrimination, or an impermissible conferral of judicial power on the executive. On that construction, the municipal tax was validly imposed and the challenge to the levy failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>