<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the interest payments to family members were legitimate, necessary for business purposes, and aligned with market practices. The Tribunal emphasized that the payees had declared the interest income and paid taxes accordingly, indicating compliance. The decision, in line with CBDT circular and judicial precedents, was pronounced on 18/05/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 09:54:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the interest payments to family members were legitimate, necessary for business purposes, and aligned with market practices. The Tribunal emphasized that the payees had declared the interest income and paid taxes accordingly, indicating compliance. The decision, in line with CBDT circular and judicial precedents, was pronounced on 18/05/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>