https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186979 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was declined because an effective statutory appellate remedy existed under Section 31(1) of the A.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The Court held that the petitioner had not exhausted the alternate remedy available under the Act, and that this justified refusal to entertain the writ petition. The petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 09:54:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186979 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was declined because an effective statutory appellate remedy existed under Section 31(1) of the A.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The Court held that the petitioner had not exhausted the alternate remedy available under the Act, and that this justified refusal to entertain the writ petition. The petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186979