https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186963 The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision to set aside the confiscation and delete the penalty imposed on the primary gold of foreign origin seized from the respondent. The respondent's retraction of his initial statement was corroborated by the Commissioner of Customs' investigation, confirming the gold was lawfully purchased from a specific party in Delhi. Despite the appellant's argument against the credibility of the retraction, the Court found no substantial question of law and upheld the decision based on the evidence presented. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:28:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186963 The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision to set aside the confiscation and delete the penalty imposed on the primary gold of foreign origin seized from the respondent. The respondent's retraction of his initial statement was corroborated by the Commissioner of Customs' investigation, confirming the gold was lawfully purchased from a specific party in Delhi. Despite the appellant's argument against the credibility of the retraction, the Court found no substantial question of law and upheld the decision based on the evidence presented. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186963