<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5300</link>
    <description>SC upheld constitutionality of clause (10C) of s.10 Income-tax Act, holding the distinction between public sector and private sector employees is a reasonable classification with an intelligible differentia and rational nexus to the statutory objective of improving public sector viability by incentivising voluntary retirement. The Court found the tax exemption a permissible incentive for shedding surplus manpower, not hostile discrimination, and rejected reading the provision to include private employers, noting the concurrent statutory definition of &quot;public sector company.&quot; Writ petition dismissed; no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5300</link>
      <description>SC upheld constitutionality of clause (10C) of s.10 Income-tax Act, holding the distinction between public sector and private sector employees is a reasonable classification with an intelligible differentia and rational nexus to the statutory objective of improving public sector viability by incentivising voluntary retirement. The Court found the tax exemption a permissible incentive for shedding surplus manpower, not hostile discrimination, and rejected reading the provision to include private employers, noting the concurrent statutory definition of &quot;public sector company.&quot; Writ petition dismissed; no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>