<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 186 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333166</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant regarding the eligibility of Cenvat Credit for the Service Tax paid for the shed erection. The tribunal found that the service received was directly related to the manufacturing activities, falling within the definition of input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was provided as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 186 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333166</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant regarding the eligibility of Cenvat Credit for the Service Tax paid for the shed erection. The tribunal found that the service received was directly related to the manufacturing activities, falling within the definition of input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was provided as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>