<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 184 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333164</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (A), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the allowance of cenvat credit on various input services. The Tribunal emphasized that the services in question were utilized in the manufacturing business, aligning with precedents supporting the eligibility of cenvat credit for services in the manufacturing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 184 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333164</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (A), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the allowance of cenvat credit on various input services. The Tribunal emphasized that the services in question were utilized in the manufacturing business, aligning with precedents supporting the eligibility of cenvat credit for services in the manufacturing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>