<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 181 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333161</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the tribunal&#039;s ruling that expenditure on abandoned cell site projects constitutes revenue expenditure. The court determined the expenses were incurred to enhance existing cellular service operations, not create a new income source. Since the towers were intended for the company&#039;s own use and abandoned due to site unsuitability, the expenditure remained revenue-based and allowable under income tax regulations. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 15:06:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 181 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333161</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the tribunal&#039;s ruling that expenditure on abandoned cell site projects constitutes revenue expenditure. The court determined the expenses were incurred to enhance existing cellular service operations, not create a new income source. Since the towers were intended for the company&#039;s own use and abandoned due to site unsuitability, the expenditure remained revenue-based and allowable under income tax regulations. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>