<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 163 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal consistently upheld the deletions made by the CIT(A) for various additions made by the AO under Sections 68, 69B, and 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, as well as for estimating household expenses and unaccounted receipts, primarily on the grounds that these additions were not based on any incriminating material found during the search, thereby exceeding the scope of Section 153A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 163 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal consistently upheld the deletions made by the CIT(A) for various additions made by the AO under Sections 68, 69B, and 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, as well as for estimating household expenses and unaccounted receipts, primarily on the grounds that these additions were not based on any incriminating material found during the search, thereby exceeding the scope of Section 153A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>