<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 161 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the Principal CIT&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing a fresh assessment, finding that the original assessment was not erroneous. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 14A of the Act, depreciation rate on office equipment, and deduction under section 35D, upholding the assessee&#039;s arguments and rejecting the CIT&#039;s contentions on these matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:47:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 161 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the Principal CIT&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing a fresh assessment, finding that the original assessment was not erroneous. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 14A of the Act, depreciation rate on office equipment, and deduction under section 35D, upholding the assessee&#039;s arguments and rejecting the CIT&#039;s contentions on these matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>