<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1195 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal noted that the proviso to Section 35B(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 places an express bar on appeals concerning rebate of duty on exported goods. Applying that statutory restriction, it held that such a rebate dispute was not entertainable before the Tribunal and that the Revenue had to seek the proper remedy before the appropriate forum. The appeal was therefore not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 11:37:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1195 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal noted that the proviso to Section 35B(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 places an express bar on appeals concerning rebate of duty on exported goods. Applying that statutory restriction, it held that such a rebate dispute was not entertainable before the Tribunal and that the Revenue had to seek the proper remedy before the appropriate forum. The appeal was therefore not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>