<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1107 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186948</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled that the appellants must pay the service tax amount and interest as required by law. The waiver of predeposit was not granted, and the appellants were directed to comply with the statute within 60 days to avoid penal action. However, they remained liable to pay interest, which was deemed a civil liability, not a penalty. The appeal challenging the interest demand was dismissed, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:54:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1107 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186948</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled that the appellants must pay the service tax amount and interest as required by law. The waiver of predeposit was not granted, and the appellants were directed to comply with the statute within 60 days to avoid penal action. However, they remained liable to pay interest, which was deemed a civil liability, not a penalty. The appeal challenging the interest demand was dismissed, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>