https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186946 The Tribunal remanded the assessee's appeal to the Adjudicating authority for re-examination regarding the rejection of a refund claim on the grounds of time bar under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals) decision to allow the Cenvat credit and refund due to inadmissible input services, emphasizing that the denial of credit without prior notice was beyond the scope of the show cause notice. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner(Appeals) order on Cenvat credit and refund issues. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 10:21:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186946 The Tribunal remanded the assessee's appeal to the Adjudicating authority for re-examination regarding the rejection of a refund claim on the grounds of time bar under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals) decision to allow the Cenvat credit and refund due to inadmissible input services, emphasizing that the denial of credit without prior notice was beyond the scope of the show cause notice. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner(Appeals) order on Cenvat credit and refund issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186946