https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333131 Supervisory interference was unwarranted where the trial court had judiciously allowed an application under Section 311 CrPC to place an undertaking on record. The undertaking contained an express admission of receipt of loan amounts and was therefore relevant to the complaint proceedings. The court held that Section 311 is discretionary and is meant to secure the best available evidence for proper adjudication; once that discretion is properly exercised, the High Court will not substitute its own view merely because the matter is at an advanced stage. No prejudice to the opposite side was shown, and cross-examination remained available. The order was upheld and no interference was called for. en-us Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:12:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333131 Supervisory interference was unwarranted where the trial court had judiciously allowed an application under Section 311 CrPC to place an undertaking on record. The undertaking contained an express admission of receipt of loan amounts and was therefore relevant to the complaint proceedings. The court held that Section 311 is discretionary and is meant to secure the best available evidence for proper adjudication; once that discretion is properly exercised, the High Court will not substitute its own view merely because the matter is at an advanced stage. No prejudice to the opposite side was shown, and cross-examination remained available. The order was upheld and no interference was called for. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333131