https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333126 In the absence of proof that the revisional order had been challenged by appeal or special leave petition, the Court treated the matter as no longer sub judice on the record before it. Relying on the Advocate-on-Record communication and the discharge of the bank guarantees by the assessing authority, it held that the petitioner's refund representations required consideration in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to process the refund claim and refund the admissible amount within six weeks. en-us Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333126 In the absence of proof that the revisional order had been challenged by appeal or special leave petition, the Court treated the matter as no longer sub judice on the record before it. Relying on the Advocate-on-Record communication and the discharge of the bank guarantees by the assessing authority, it held that the petitioner's refund representations required consideration in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to process the refund claim and refund the admissible amount within six weeks. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333126