<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 144 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333124</link>
    <description>Non-furnishing of relied upon purchase bills and related details vitiated the assessment for breach of natural justice, because the taxpayer was not given a meaningful opportunity to meet the proposed additions under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Repeated requests for the documents and filed objections showed that the disputed factual particulars were never properly verified before the final assessment was made. The Madras High Court therefore set aside the assessment order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing that the relied upon bills be furnished and that objections and oral hearing be afforded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:11:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 144 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333124</link>
      <description>Non-furnishing of relied upon purchase bills and related details vitiated the assessment for breach of natural justice, because the taxpayer was not given a meaningful opportunity to meet the proposed additions under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Repeated requests for the documents and filed objections showed that the disputed factual particulars were never properly verified before the final assessment was made. The Madras High Court therefore set aside the assessment order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing that the relied upon bills be furnished and that objections and oral hearing be afforded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>