<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 143 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333123</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration. The decision aimed to rectify procedural shortcomings by ordering re-assessment with proper opportunity for objection submission and a personal hearing, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:11:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 143 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333123</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration. The decision aimed to rectify procedural shortcomings by ordering re-assessment with proper opportunity for objection submission and a personal hearing, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>