<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 142 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333122</link>
    <description>For a convict sentenced under the NDPS Act, parole had to be considered under the Central Government rules framed in 1955, because the offence fell within a field where Union executive power extended. The Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 were therefore inapplicable. Non-deposit of the fine amount was not a condition precedent for consideration of permanent parole, particularly where the default sentence for non-payment had already been undergone. The rejection order was set aside and the matter was directed to be reconsidered under the applicable Central Government framework in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 142 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333122</link>
      <description>For a convict sentenced under the NDPS Act, parole had to be considered under the Central Government rules framed in 1955, because the offence fell within a field where Union executive power extended. The Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 were therefore inapplicable. Non-deposit of the fine amount was not a condition precedent for consideration of permanent parole, particularly where the default sentence for non-payment had already been undergone. The rejection order was set aside and the matter was directed to be reconsidered under the applicable Central Government framework in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>