<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 141 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333121</link>
    <description>The confusion regarding the filing of a refund application before the Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Refunds) and the jurisdictional customs officer led to the appeal being remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further consideration. The lack of a clear definition of the jurisdictional customs officer necessitated clarification based on relevant notifications and precedents. The appellant is entitled to due process, and the authority must adhere to legal procedures and timelines in handling refund applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 141 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333121</link>
      <description>The confusion regarding the filing of a refund application before the Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Refunds) and the jurisdictional customs officer led to the appeal being remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further consideration. The lack of a clear definition of the jurisdictional customs officer necessitated clarification based on relevant notifications and precedents. The appellant is entitled to due process, and the authority must adhere to legal procedures and timelines in handling refund applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>