<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 139 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case involving the confiscation of cash seized during an investigation for alleged clandestine clearance of goods. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider and decide the confiscation of cash and the duty demand together due to their close connection arising from the same investigation. The original Adjudicating Authority was directed to decide both matters jointly and provide the appellant with an opportunity to represent their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:11:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 139 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case involving the confiscation of cash seized during an investigation for alleged clandestine clearance of goods. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider and decide the confiscation of cash and the duty demand together due to their close connection arising from the same investigation. The original Adjudicating Authority was directed to decide both matters jointly and provide the appellant with an opportunity to represent their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>