<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1245 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186940</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad Bench affirmed the addition of bogus purchases by an assessee-company, upholding the penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty based on the income assessed, considering precedents and legal arguments raised by the appellant. The appeal was partly allowed, and the penalty computation was adjusted accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 18:13:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1245 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186940</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad Bench affirmed the addition of bogus purchases by an assessee-company, upholding the penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty based on the income assessed, considering precedents and legal arguments raised by the appellant. The appeal was partly allowed, and the penalty computation was adjusted accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>