https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186929 The SC set aside the Orissa HC's judgment directing the appellant-Corporation to pay the respondent, finding it unsustainable due to the presence of factual disputes inappropriate for adjudication under Article 226. The SC emphasized that writ petitions are not suitable for resolving factual disputes in breach of contract claims. The appeal was allowed without costs, permitting the respondent to pursue alternative legal remedies. en-us Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Apr 2024 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186929 The SC set aside the Orissa HC's judgment directing the appellant-Corporation to pay the respondent, finding it unsustainable due to the presence of factual disputes inappropriate for adjudication under Article 226. The SC emphasized that writ petitions are not suitable for resolving factual disputes in breach of contract claims. The appeal was allowed without costs, permitting the respondent to pursue alternative legal remedies. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186929