https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186918 A prima facie view that an explanatory amendment in a service tax notification does not operate retrospectively justified interim relief to the assessee. In a similar pending matter, the Bench had already taken the same view and noted that the later impugned order did not address that earlier stay order. On that basis, the Bench granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the service tax demand, leaving the issue open for further proceedings. en-us Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:29:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186918 A prima facie view that an explanatory amendment in a service tax notification does not operate retrospectively justified interim relief to the assessee. In a similar pending matter, the Bench had already taken the same view and noted that the later impugned order did not address that earlier stay order. On that basis, the Bench granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the service tax demand, leaving the issue open for further proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186918