<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 939 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186917</link>
    <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Income Tax Appeal Nos. 27, 224 of 2004, 93, 94, 165, and 637 of 2005, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanding the matter for a fresh decision on the applicability of section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the marketing of sugar by members of the Cooperative Society. The legal issue had been previously decided in favor of the assessee by the Full Bench of the Court, directing the parties to appear before the Tribunal for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:00:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 939 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186917</link>
      <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Income Tax Appeal Nos. 27, 224 of 2004, 93, 94, 165, and 637 of 2005, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanding the matter for a fresh decision on the applicability of section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the marketing of sugar by members of the Cooperative Society. The legal issue had been previously decided in favor of the assessee by the Full Bench of the Court, directing the parties to appear before the Tribunal for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>