https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333112 The appeal against the rejection of a refund claim due to unjust enrichment regarding the payment of excise duty on an intermediate product was successful. The Member (Judicial) found that the duty incidence had not been passed on to any other person based on the evidence presented. The case was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, with instructions to grant a personal hearing to the appellant and issue a new order within three months. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed for further examination of the evidence and arguments. en-us Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333112 The appeal against the rejection of a refund claim due to unjust enrichment regarding the payment of excise duty on an intermediate product was successful. The Member (Judicial) found that the duty incidence had not been passed on to any other person based on the evidence presented. The case was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, with instructions to grant a personal hearing to the appellant and issue a new order within three months. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed for further examination of the evidence and arguments. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333112