<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 1 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5285</link>
    <description>Capital gains treatment of the referred issue was measured against the precedent in CIT v. B. C. Srinivasa Setty, and the Supreme Court held that the matter was already covered by that earlier decision. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s answer to the referred question was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 1 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5285</link>
      <description>Capital gains treatment of the referred issue was measured against the precedent in CIT v. B. C. Srinivasa Setty, and the Supreme Court held that the matter was already covered by that earlier decision. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s answer to the referred question was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>