https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333105 The appeal was dismissed solely because the tax effect was negligible, and the Court did not decide the substantive question of law raised. The underlying legal issue was expressly left open for future consideration, so no adjudication was made on the merits of that question. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 13:30:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333105 The appeal was dismissed solely because the tax effect was negligible, and the Court did not decide the substantive question of law raised. The underlying legal issue was expressly left open for future consideration, so no adjudication was made on the merits of that question. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333105