https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333096 The HC directed that if the petitioner files its statutory appeal before the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal within three weeks, the Tribunal should not insist on a separate condonation application and should treat limitation as unopposed; if filed later, delay must be justified and decided according to law. The Tribunal was also directed to decide the appeal on merits itself, without remand to lower authorities, and to address the substantive issues raised. Recovery was to remain stayed so long as the petitioner maintains the specified bank guarantee until disposal of the appeal and for six weeks thereafter. The Tribunal was asked to dispose of the appeal expeditiously, and in any event by 31 December 2016. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 13:29:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333096 The HC directed that if the petitioner files its statutory appeal before the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal within three weeks, the Tribunal should not insist on a separate condonation application and should treat limitation as unopposed; if filed later, delay must be justified and decided according to law. The Tribunal was also directed to decide the appeal on merits itself, without remand to lower authorities, and to address the substantive issues raised. Recovery was to remain stayed so long as the petitioner maintains the specified bank guarantee until disposal of the appeal and for six weeks thereafter. The Tribunal was asked to dispose of the appeal expeditiously, and in any event by 31 December 2016. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333096