<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 112 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333092</link>
    <description>The civil miscellaneous appeal was withdrawn and dismissed because of the monetary limit instruction issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The questions of law were expressly left open, so no substantive legal issue was decided on merits. Liberty was reserved to seek revival within the stated period if the withdrawal was inadvertent and the case fell within the exceptions provided in the instruction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 112 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333092</link>
      <description>The civil miscellaneous appeal was withdrawn and dismissed because of the monetary limit instruction issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The questions of law were expressly left open, so no substantive legal issue was decided on merits. Liberty was reserved to seek revival within the stated period if the withdrawal was inadvertent and the case fell within the exceptions provided in the instruction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>