<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 102 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333082</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the classification of the Rs. 50 Lakhs as &#039;Income From Other Sources&#039;, dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The amount received was deemed not in exchange for surrendering any capital rights but as income from other sources due to the lack of evidence supporting the claim of long-term capital gains. The decision highlighted the necessity of substantial evidence and legal documentation to substantiate claims of capital gains and property rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 13:29:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 102 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333082</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the classification of the Rs. 50 Lakhs as &#039;Income From Other Sources&#039;, dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The amount received was deemed not in exchange for surrendering any capital rights but as income from other sources due to the lack of evidence supporting the claim of long-term capital gains. The decision highlighted the necessity of substantial evidence and legal documentation to substantiate claims of capital gains and property rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>