<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 88 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, including reducing the stock difference addition, deleting the renovation expenses addition, partially sustaining the excess cash addition, and accepting the lower additional income disclosure amount. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 88 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, including reducing the stock difference addition, deleting the renovation expenses addition, partially sustaining the excess cash addition, and accepting the lower additional income disclosure amount. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>