<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 856 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186910</link>
    <description>The statutory scheme under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and the Development Control Regulations for Greater Bombay, 1991 created two distinct entitlements: FSI or TDR for surrender of reserved land, and further additional FSI or TDR where the owner develops or constructs the amenity on that land at his own cost. Appendix VII, paragraph 6 measured that additional entitlement by the area of the construction or development done, not by its value or cost. A municipal circular could not override or dilute this quantified statutory right. The restriction of additional TDR to 15% of the road area was therefore unlawful, and the entitlement remained equivalent to the area of the road constructed by the landowners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 856 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186910</link>
      <description>The statutory scheme under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and the Development Control Regulations for Greater Bombay, 1991 created two distinct entitlements: FSI or TDR for surrender of reserved land, and further additional FSI or TDR where the owner develops or constructs the amenity on that land at his own cost. Appendix VII, paragraph 6 measured that additional entitlement by the area of the construction or development done, not by its value or cost. A municipal circular could not override or dilute this quantified statutory right. The restriction of additional TDR to 15% of the road area was therefore unlawful, and the entitlement remained equivalent to the area of the road constructed by the landowners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>