https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186904 An executing court cannot enlarge the time fixed by consent in a compromise decree, because that time is a contractual stipulation incorporated by agreement and not a period fixed by the court under section 148 CPC; the extension order was therefore without jurisdiction and could not defeat execution of the eviction clause. Tenant protection under section 13 of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 applies during the suit or appeal stage, not in execution proceedings after default has already been adjudged; the tenant could not invoke it to resist eviction. The landlord's execution petition was maintainable and should succeed. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:14:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186904 An executing court cannot enlarge the time fixed by consent in a compromise decree, because that time is a contractual stipulation incorporated by agreement and not a period fixed by the court under section 148 CPC; the extension order was therefore without jurisdiction and could not defeat execution of the eviction clause. Tenant protection under section 13 of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 applies during the suit or appeal stage, not in execution proceedings after default has already been adjudged; the tenant could not invoke it to resist eviction. The landlord's execution petition was maintainable and should succeed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186904