https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186899 Valuation of captively consumed yarn under Rule 6(b)(1) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 was directed to be reconsidered because the Supreme Court had already remanded the assessee's own earlier case for adjustment of certain costs on the basis of further material. Applying that approach to the same valuation issue, the Tribunal held that fresh adjudication was appropriate. The matter was sent back to the adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication, with an opportunity to produce additional information and for duty to be recomputed after hearing the assessee. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:14:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186899 Valuation of captively consumed yarn under Rule 6(b)(1) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 was directed to be reconsidered because the Supreme Court had already remanded the assessee's own earlier case for adjustment of certain costs on the basis of further material. Applying that approach to the same valuation issue, the Tribunal held that fresh adjudication was appropriate. The matter was sent back to the adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication, with an opportunity to produce additional information and for duty to be recomputed after hearing the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186899