https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186891 A subsequent eviction petition based on bona fide requirement is maintainable when the earlier petition on the same ground was withdrawn without adjudication, because the landlord's need is a recurring cause assessed on the date of the later proceeding. Section 45 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 does not bar a fresh proceeding unless substantially the same was finally decided earlier, and Order XXIII Rule 1(4)(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 does not apply merely because the premises are the same. The later petition may proceed where a new and genuine need is shown. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:08:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186891 A subsequent eviction petition based on bona fide requirement is maintainable when the earlier petition on the same ground was withdrawn without adjudication, because the landlord's need is a recurring cause assessed on the date of the later proceeding. Section 45 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 does not bar a fresh proceeding unless substantially the same was finally decided earlier, and Order XXIII Rule 1(4)(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 does not apply merely because the premises are the same. The later petition may proceed where a new and genuine need is shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186891