<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 211 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186889</link>
    <description>Pre-emptive share-transfer restrictions require each existing shareholder&#039;s express waiver before shares may be transferred to an outsider; board participation or implied assent is insufficient. Foreign exchange controls may prevent a foreign shareholder from retaining effective control through a nominee where dilution is required to preserve Indian control. Share transmission following a shareholder&#039;s death requires compliance with succession provisions, including a specific legacy, probate and executor assent where applicable. In an equally held company operating on partnership principles, deadlock, lack of probity, attempts to alter management control and threatened termination of a sole selling agency may support oppression relief under the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:03:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 211 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186889</link>
      <description>Pre-emptive share-transfer restrictions require each existing shareholder&#039;s express waiver before shares may be transferred to an outsider; board participation or implied assent is insufficient. Foreign exchange controls may prevent a foreign shareholder from retaining effective control through a nominee where dilution is required to preserve Indian control. Share transmission following a shareholder&#039;s death requires compliance with succession provisions, including a specific legacy, probate and executor assent where applicable. In an equally held company operating on partnership principles, deadlock, lack of probity, attempts to alter management control and threatened termination of a sole selling agency may support oppression relief under the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>