<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1187 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It was held that the appellant was not liable to deduct tax at source under section 194C due to compliance with section 194C(6) by obtaining the PAN of the contractors. The judgment clarified the interplay between different sections of the Income Tax Act and emphasized the importance of strict compliance with statutory provisions to avoid disallowances under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1187 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It was held that the appellant was not liable to deduct tax at source under section 194C due to compliance with section 194C(6) by obtaining the PAN of the contractors. The judgment clarified the interplay between different sections of the Income Tax Act and emphasized the importance of strict compliance with statutory provisions to avoid disallowances under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>