https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186875 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision requiring the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2 crores in a service tax liability case, despite the petitioner's contention for a 67% abatement on finishing services. The Court declined to interfere with the CESTAT's discretionary order, emphasizing the need for early resolution of appeals to ensure efficient handling of similar cases. en-us Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 18:40:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186875 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision requiring the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2 crores in a service tax liability case, despite the petitioner's contention for a 67% abatement on finishing services. The Court declined to interfere with the CESTAT's discretionary order, emphasizing the need for early resolution of appeals to ensure efficient handling of similar cases. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186875