<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1125 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186873</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner&#039;s claim for damages arising from goods auctioned by the customs department cannot be adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It was determined that the proper forum for such a claim is the Civil Court, where evidence can be presented to establish the loss suffered. The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to pursue the matter in the appropriate legal venue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 18:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1125 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186873</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner&#039;s claim for damages arising from goods auctioned by the customs department cannot be adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It was determined that the proper forum for such a claim is the Civil Court, where evidence can be presented to establish the loss suffered. The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to pursue the matter in the appropriate legal venue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>