<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5275</link>
    <description>Allotment of shares in a transferee company under an amalgamation scheme did not amount to an exchange because there was no reciprocal transfer of property by the assessee, and it did not amount to a relinquishment because the transferor company had dissolved and no subsisting property remained capable of abandonment. On that reasoning, the receipt of new shares was outside section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and no capital gains were attracted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5275</link>
      <description>Allotment of shares in a transferee company under an amalgamation scheme did not amount to an exchange because there was no reciprocal transfer of property by the assessee, and it did not amount to a relinquishment because the transferor company had dissolved and no subsisting property remained capable of abandonment. On that reasoning, the receipt of new shares was outside section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and no capital gains were attracted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>