<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 84 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333064</link>
    <description>Bihar entry tax amendments applied to e-commerce purchases for personal use or consumption were analysed under Part XIII of the Constitution. The scheme was considered discriminatory because the second proviso to Section 3(2) denied set-off where the ultimate consumer was not a dealer under the Bihar VAT regime, leaving imported goods with a higher cumulative burden than comparable local goods. The commentary states that a compensatory character does not by itself shield a levy from Article 304(a) scrutiny when its operation creates a fiscal barrier and hostile discrimination against inter-State goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 84 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333064</link>
      <description>Bihar entry tax amendments applied to e-commerce purchases for personal use or consumption were analysed under Part XIII of the Constitution. The scheme was considered discriminatory because the second proviso to Section 3(2) denied set-off where the ultimate consumer was not a dealer under the Bihar VAT regime, leaving imported goods with a higher cumulative burden than comparable local goods. The commentary states that a compensatory character does not by itself shield a levy from Article 304(a) scrutiny when its operation creates a fiscal barrier and hostile discrimination against inter-State goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>