<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 77 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333057</link>
    <description>A three-wheeler chassis sold under the sales tax law fell within the exemption notification because the notification covered all types of three-wheeler commercial motor vehicles and their chassis, while excluding auto rickshaws. On the recorded facts, the goods sold were a chassis and not an auto rickshaw, so the reduced tax rate was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 16:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 77 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333057</link>
      <description>A three-wheeler chassis sold under the sales tax law fell within the exemption notification because the notification covered all types of three-wheeler commercial motor vehicles and their chassis, while excluding auto rickshaws. On the recorded facts, the goods sold were a chassis and not an auto rickshaw, so the reduced tax rate was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>