<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 70 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333050</link>
    <description>The anti-dumping notification&#039;s benchmark landed price exemption was upheld because it was tied to the Designated Authority&#039;s final findings on dumping and injury. The Authority had examined normal value, non-injurious price, raw material trends, price fluctuations, demand, market share, and the effects of dumped imports, and concluded that the dumping margin remained significant, price undercutting and underselling continued, and the domestic industry suffered material injury. On that basis, the landed-price benchmark was part of the duty structure supported by material evidence and was not arbitrary or infirm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 70 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333050</link>
      <description>The anti-dumping notification&#039;s benchmark landed price exemption was upheld because it was tied to the Designated Authority&#039;s final findings on dumping and injury. The Authority had examined normal value, non-injurious price, raw material trends, price fluctuations, demand, market share, and the effects of dumped imports, and concluded that the dumping margin remained significant, price undercutting and underselling continued, and the domestic industry suffered material injury. On that basis, the landed-price benchmark was part of the duty structure supported by material evidence and was not arbitrary or infirm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>