https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333049 In anti-dumping proceedings, injury to the domestic industry was upheld where the Designated Authority examined demand, production, capacity utilisation, sales, profitability and the effect of dumped imports, and found that rising demand outpaced domestic output while price indicators deteriorated. Non-dumped imports and intra-industry competition were not shown to be the principal cause of injury, so the duty was sustained. The methodology for reasonable return on capital employed, non-injurious price and price undercutting was also upheld: the claimed return followed consistent practice and was not rebutted, and undercutting could validly be assessed on landed price rather than the importer's resale price. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333049 In anti-dumping proceedings, injury to the domestic industry was upheld where the Designated Authority examined demand, production, capacity utilisation, sales, profitability and the effect of dumped imports, and found that rising demand outpaced domestic output while price indicators deteriorated. Non-dumped imports and intra-industry competition were not shown to be the principal cause of injury, so the duty was sustained. The methodology for reasonable return on capital employed, non-injurious price and price undercutting was also upheld: the claimed return followed consistent practice and was not rebutted, and undercutting could validly be assessed on landed price rather than the importer's resale price. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333049